.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Midterm Exam Comparative Cj Systems

NameCourseProfessor in that location are two dominant effectual traditions that exist in the world today the gracious justice tradition and the park impartiality tradition . The Civil law tradition s fundamental law may be traced from Continental Europe whereas the harsh police force tradition has its beginnings from England . Mixed healthy traditions that are practiced in some countries are just variations of either tradition . There are several differences between the common law and the well-bred law tradition that can settle down be traced affirm from their respective originsThe main difference of the two traditions is their source for legal reasoning . The Civil code tradition based their arguments in legislation which , when general rules and norms of private law are in question , takes the form of a code (Von Mehren , 2000 ) while the Common Law tradition bases its legal reasoning on juridic decisions and on statutes (Von Mehren , 2000 . This difference in priority can be explained by the situation of the legislator in some(prenominal) traditions . Civil law adopts the theory of separation of powers espoused by Montesquieu whereby the function of the courts is to apply the law that the legislators enacted . Common law , on the other hand , places more(prenominal) weight on judge-made laws and jurisprudence (Tetley , 1999Different countries follow different legal traditions , some strictly adhere to the common or civil law tradition while others practice a gang of the two . The shall compare and discuss two countries , namely the joined States who follows the common law tradition and the Philippines who adheres to a mixture of both common law and civil law traditionsThe Philippine efficacious traditionThe Philippine legal tradition may be traced tail from the Romans . At the time of the expansion of the Roman Empire , it was set about with a problem .
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
With the acquisition of revolutionary territory and passel came contact between the indigenous Roman populace and the recent settlers , the conduct of the Romans were governed by the jus civile but the new settlers were not . These new developments created a need for a private law government to determine and guide relationships between citizens and non-citizens (AppleAnother situation that called for a systemise system of laws was the judicial system of the empire . During that time , a praetor or the judge , had a limited role in the disposition of cases and was elected for a term of except 1 year in office thus large his decisions virtually no significance and weight in come along cases . Furthermore , before holding office , the judge shall initiative read his code or the way on how he shall settle cases , jurists or legal experts would then create a Responsa or response wherein they answer questions espoused by the people regarding the Edict (Apple . The practice of reading the Edict was eventually abolished making the jurists flake to writing treatises covering specific aspects of Roman lawSoon the opinions of jurists were patented and were attached the force of law , but the opinions were scattered and there was still need of a comprehensive...If you want to get a full(a) essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .

No comments:

Post a Comment