.

Friday, November 9, 2012

Essay by Janet Radcliffe Richards-"Thinking Straight and Dying Well"

Another argument Richards exposes for its fallibility is the champion adopted by those who feel that if we make unforced euthanasia legal we will be setting up a situation where relatives and physicians will suddenly turn to coercing sick relatives or patients to die. Again, the creator shows us the hidden agenda in much(prenominal) spurious arguments?an agenda that regards felo-de-se as lessonly unimaginable under any conditions. For as the author states "Even if suicide were allowed, I do not see why hatful who did not want the risk of pressure could not signboard an anti-suicide pledge, and join societies and churches committed to the repudiation of this option" (Richards 134).

The word make is an important implied concept in the above statement because the author views voluntary suicide not as a moral argument plainly one ab stunned freedom of selection "the idea that an essential element of a good behavior is the freedom to leav


it in pink of my John and dignity" (Richards 137). Nonetheless, self-appointed morality police have enacted commandment that it is wrong to assist a person who wishes to die but cannot help themselves achieve the goal. The present laws do not rule out the committing of suicide, but there be plenty of them that forbid person helping a helpless person who wants to carry out that option.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Therefore, the author argues these multitude must oppose suicide in general because "if the law does not forbid suicide, it has no confession for [making illegal] the assisting of suicide" (Richards 137).

Radcliffe Richards, J. Thinking straight and dying well. Voluntary mercy killing Society, (Newsletter), Sept. 1994, 129-137.

In conclusion, the author demonstrates how most people who argue against voluntary euthanasia are not arguing against voluntary euthanasia. What they are doing is trying to use specious appeals to defend their underlying argument that under no circumstances is suicide morally acceptable. Therefore, these people are condemning people to misery and pain by robbing them of their right to choose to end their lives with assistance, something they legally
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.

No comments:

Post a Comment