The word make is an important implied concept in the above statement because the author views voluntary suicide not as a moral argument plainly one ab stunned freedom of selection "the idea that an essential element of a good behavior is the freedom to leav
it in pink of my John and dignity" (Richards 137). Nonetheless, self-appointed morality police have enacted commandment that it is wrong to assist a person who wishes to die but cannot help themselves achieve the goal. The present laws do not rule out the committing of suicide, but there be plenty of them that forbid person helping a helpless person who wants to carry out that option.
Therefore, the author argues these multitude must oppose suicide in general because "if the law does not forbid suicide, it has no confession for [making illegal] the assisting of suicide" (Richards 137).
Radcliffe Richards, J. Thinking straight and dying well. Voluntary mercy killing Society, (Newsletter), Sept. 1994, 129-137.
In conclusion, the author demonstrates how most people who argue against voluntary euthanasia are not arguing against voluntary euthanasia. What they are doing is trying to use specious appeals to defend their underlying argument that under no circumstances is suicide morally acceptable. Therefore, these people are condemning people to misery and pain by robbing them of their right to choose to end their lives with assistance, something they legally
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment